2000 Years of Disbelief: Sigmund Freud

By James Haught

James Haught is editor of West Virginia’s largest newspaper, The Charleston Gazette, and a senior editor of Free Inquiry. He is 87-years-old and would like to help secular causes more. This series is a way of giving back.

—

(June 22, 2020 – Daylight Atheism)

This is the nineteenth segment of a series on renowned skeptics throughout history. These profiles are drawn from 2000 Years of Disbelief: Famous People With the Courage to Doubt, Prometheus Books, 1996.

Sigmund Freud, the great Viennese explorer of the mind, is recognized worldwide as the chief founder of modern psychiatry. His explanation of childhood sexual urges and the Oedipus complex, of the action of repressed thoughts in the subconscious, of wish-fulfillment in dreams, and of other hidden mental processes have become part of the world’s scientific knowledge.

But the public is generally unaware that Freud was a fervent crusader against religion, which he deemed an obstacle to human intelligence.

Popular television host Phil Donahue wrote that Freud prodded the Western world to think scientifically and drop the “childish ways” of believing in spirit realms. Here is Donahue’s summation of Freud’s message:

“‘Grow up,’ he seemed to be saying, as if giving a child a spoonful of castor oil. ‘Forget those silly old tales. There’s no heaven, no hell, no angels, or devils or gods or saviors. Be brave and accept the natural world of science.’ Religion’s eleventh commandment is ‘Thou shalt not question,’ and Freud saw in that prohibition a bar to scientific inquiry, which begins with questions.”

Similarly, biographer Philip Rieff remarked: “Religion may have been the original cure; Freud reminds us that it was also the original disease.” And British Jewish leader Jacob Meitlis recalled that Freud, his friend, felt that “all religions were matters created by human beings, and he could discern no trace of sanctity in any of them.”

Again and again in his writing, Freud contended that small children have awesome images of their fathers as powerful protectors and punishers, and that, years later, this fantasy of the Great Father, still buried in the subconscious, attaches itself to the imaginary God of religion. Thus, unwittingly, believers worship the submerged infantile memory of their fathers. Repeatedly, Freud called religion a “universal obsessional neurosis.”

Freud’s scientific realism developed at an early age. A brilliant student, he entered medical school under physiologist Ernst Briicke, who taught that the human psyche is purely biological, not mystical or divine. Briicke had himself been influenced by physicist Hermann Helmholtz’s contention that “no other forces than the common physical-chemical ones are active within the organism.”

Throughout his career of analyzing human behavior, Freud attempted to apply scientific methods to understanding fears, feelings and fantasies. Today, his methods have been partly abandoned, yet he is known as the principal pioneer in grasping the submerged elements of human nature.

Incidentally, the manner of Freud’s death foreshadowed today’s euthanasia controversy, as it has focused on Dr. Jack Kevorkian, who assists hopeless patients in painless expiration. A heavy cigar smoker, Freud developed mouth cancer that blighted the last twenty-two years of his life. While he strove to continue working and writing, he underwent thirty-three operations and eventually was forced to wear a grotesque prosthesis. Finally exhausted, he persuaded his physician to give him enough morphine to end his suffering forever.

Freud’s views on religion

“Neither in my private life nor in my writings, have I ever made a secret of being an out-and-out unbeliever.” – letter to Charles Singer

“Religion is an attempt to get control over the sensory world, in which we have been placed, by means of the wish-world which we have developed inside us as a result of biological and psychological necessities. But it cannot achieve its end. Its doctrines carry with them the stamp of the times in which they originated, the ignorant childhood days of the human race. Its consolations deserve no trust. … If one attempts to assign to religion its place in man’s evolution, it seems not so much to be a lasting acquisition, as a parallel to the neurosis which the civilized individual must pass through on his way from childhood to maturity.” – Moses and Monotheism, 1939

“Religion is an illusion and it derives its strength from the fact that it falls in with our instinctual desires.” – New Introductory Lectures in Psychoanalysis, 1933

“The God-Creator is openly called Father. Psychoanalysis concludes that he really is the father, clothed in the grandeur in which he once appeared to the small child. The religious man’s picture of the creation of the universe is the same as his picture of his own creation…. He therefore looks back on the memory-image of the overrated father of his childhood, exalts it into a deity, and brings it into the present and into reality. The emotional strength of this memory-image and the lasting nature of his need for protection are the two supports for his belief in God.” – ibid.

“Religion … comprises a system of wishful illusions together with a disavowal of reality, such as we find in an isolated form nowhere else but in amentia, in a state of blissful hallucinatory confusion.” – The Future of an Illusion, 1927

“Religion is comparable to a childhood neurosis.” – ibid.

“Our knowledge of the historical worth of certain religious doctrines increases our respect for them, but does not invalidate our proposal that they should cease to be put forward as the reasons for the precepts of civilization. On the contrary! Those historical residues have helped us to view religious teachings, as it were, as neurotic relics.” – ibid.

“The different religions have never overlooked the part played by the sense of guilt in civilization. What is more, they come forward with a claim … to save mankind from this sense of guilt, which they call sin.” – Civilization and its Discontents, 1930

“Religions originate in the child’s and young mankind’s fears and need for help. It cannot be otherwise.” – to colleague Ludwig Binswanger in 1927, quoted in Freud: The Man and the Cause, p. 469

“The Nazis? I am not afraid of them. Help me rather to combat my true enemy … Religion, the Roman Catholic Church.” – to colleague Rene Laforgue, ibid., p. 491

“The Catholic Church so far has been the implacable enemy of all freedom of thought.” – What Great Men Think of Religion, by Ira Cardiff

“When a man is freed of religion, he has a better chance to live a normal and wholesome life.” – Atheist Desk Calendar 1993, by Carole Gray

“Monotheism … revealed the father nucleus which had always lain hidden behind every divine figure…. A return to the historical roots of the idea of God… the intimacy and intensity of the child’s relation to the father.” – quoted in Webster’s New World Dictionary of Quotable Definitions

“Religion is a universal, obsessional neurosis of mankind.” – quoted by Dr. John R. Everett, president of Hollins College, in Encyclopedia Americana, 1955

“A religion, even if it calls itself a religion of love, must be hard and unloving to those who do not belong to it.” – Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, 1921

“When once the Apostle Paul had posited universal love between men as the foundation of his Christian community, extreme intolerance on the part of Christendom toward those who remained outside it became the inevitable consequence.” – Peter’s Quotations

“How strange this tragically mad land you have visited must have seemed to you. [The Holy Land] has never produced anything but religions, sacred frenzies, presumptuous attempts to overcome the outer world of appearances by means of the inner world of wishful thinking.” – from a letter to novelist Arnold Zweig, who had just returned from a visit to Palestine

“I can muster no sympathy whatever for the misguided piety that makes a national religion from a piece of the wall of Herod, and for its sake challenges the feelings of the local natives.” – discussing Zionism, the Wailing Wall, and the Palestinian problem in a letter to Albert Einstein, 1930

—

Scott Douglas Jacobsen is the Founder of In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal and In-Sight Publishing. He authored/co-authored some e-books, free or low-cost. If you want to contact Scott: Scott.D.Jacobsen@Gmail.com.

—

*Associates and resources listing last updated May 31, 2020.*

Canadian Atheist Associates: Godless Mom, Nice Mangoes, Sandwalk, Brainstorm Podcast, Left at the Valley, Life, the Universe & Everything Else, The Reality Check, Bad Science Watch, British Columbia Humanist Association, Dying With Dignity Canada, Canadian Secular Alliance, Centre for Inquiry Canada, Kelowna Atheists, Skeptics, and Humanists Association.

—

Other National/Local Resources: Association humaniste du Québec, Atheist Freethinkers, Central Ontario Humanist Association, Comox Valley Humanists, Grey Bruce Humanists, Halton-Peel Humanist Community, Hamilton Humanists, Humanist Association of London, Humanist Association of Ottawa, Humanist Association of Toronto, Humanists, Atheists and Agnostics of Manitoba, Ontario Humanist Society, Secular Connextions Seculaire, Secular Humanists in Calgary, Society of Free Thinkers (Kitchener-Waterloo/Cambridge/Guelph), Thunder Bay Humanists, Toronto Oasis, Victoria Secular Humanist Association.

—

Other International/Outside Canada Resources: Allianz vun Humanisten, Atheisten an Agnostiker, American Atheists, American Humanist Association, Associação Brasileira de Ateus e AgnósticoséééBrazilian Association of Atheists and Agnostics, Atheist Alliance International, Atheist Alliance of America, Atheist Centre, Atheist Foundation of Australia, The Brights Movement, Center for Inquiry (including Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science), Atheist Ireland, Camp Quest, Inc., Council for Secular Humanism, De Vrije Gedachte, European Humanist Federation, Federation of Indian Rationalist Associations, Foundation Beyond Belief, Freedom From Religion Foundation, Humanist Association of Ireland, Humanist International, Humanist Association of Germany, Humanist Association of Ireland, Humanist Society of Scotland, Humanists UK, Humanisterna/Humanists Sweden, Internet Infidels, International League of Non-Religious and Atheists, James Randi Educational Foundation, League of Militant Atheists, Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers, National Secular Society, Rationalist International, Recovering From Religion, Religion News Service, Secular Coalition for America, Secular Student Alliance, The Clergy Project, The Rational Response Squad, The Satanic Temple, The Sunday Assembly, United Coalition of Reason, Union of Rationalist Atheists and Agnostics.

—

About Canadian Atheist

Canadian Atheist is an independent blog with multiple contributors providing articles of interest to Canadian atheists, secularists, humanists, and freethinkers.

Canadian Atheist is not an organization – there is no membership and nothing to join – and we offer no professional services or products. It is a privately-owned publishing platform shared with our contributors, with a focus on topics relevant to Canadian atheists.

Canadian Atheist is not affiliated with any other organization or group. While our contributors may be individually be members of other organizations or groups, and may even speak in an official capacity for them, CA itself is independent.

For more information about Canadian Atheist, or to contact us for any other reason, see our contact page.

—

About Canadian Atheist Contributors

Canadian Atheist contributors are volunteers who provide content for CA. They receive no payment for their contributions from CA, though they may be sponsored by other means.

Our contributors are people who have both a passion for issues of interest to Canadian atheists, secularists, humanists, and freethinkers, and a demonstrated ability to communicate content and ideas of interest on those topics to our readers. Some are members of Canadian secularist, humanist, atheist, or freethought organizations, either at the national, provincial, regional, or local level. They come from all walks of life, and offer a diversity of perspectives and presentation styles.

CA merely provides our contributors with a platform with almost complete editorial freedom. Their opinions are their own, expressed as they see fit; they do not speak for Canadian Atheist, and Canadian Atheist does not speak for them.

For more information about Canadian Atheist’s contribors, or to get in contact with any of them, or if you are interested in becoming a contributor, see our contact page.

—

Image Credit: James Haught.