Religious Books Sneaking into Science Sections in Book Stores

Last week I engaged in vigilante book re-categorization at Chapters-Indigo. I moved Stephen Meyer’s book from the Science section to the Religion section. I had written Chapters-Indigo last year (more on this below) and they had agreed to re-categorize the book, so I wasn’t sure what happened at this store and I was too tired for a long discussion with staff so I just re-categorized it myself. Looking at the categorization online, it seems to have been placed back in Science and Nature so I will need to re-engage to find out why it was moved back.

Background: Stephen Meyer, The Discovery Institute & a Religious Book Posing as Science

For those who don’t know who Stephen Meyer is, he is a member of the Discovery Institute, a public policy think tank based in Seattle, Washington that advocates for Intelligent Design and its teaching in public high school science courses as an accepted scientific theory (which it is not). The Discovery Institute has helped promote the false perception that scientists are deeply divided over the theory of evolution (they aren’t). They also authored The Wedge Strategy which has the goal (from Wikipedia):

To defeat materialism, naturalism, evolution, and “reverse the stifling materialist world view and replace it with a science consonant with Christian and theistic convictions.”

Intelligent Design Is Religion not Science!

Intelligent Design Is Religion not Science and they aren’t Two Sides of the Same Coin!

Stephen Meyer wrote a book called Darwin’s Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design which attempts to show that an intelligent designer caused the rapid appearance (BTW, rapid in this case is far from short, it took 10-30 million years) of animal phyla over 500 million years ago during the Cambrian period.

Meyers is not a biologist or palaeontologist and both (Don Prothero and Nick Matzke) have thoroughly trashed his book. A notable review comes from a famous paleobiologist (Charles R. Marshall)  in a scientific, peer reviewed journal, Science. This review, like the others, points out Meyer’s poor, highly selective scholarship:

As Meyer points out, he is not a biologist; so perhaps he could be excused for basing his scientific arguments on an outdated understanding of morphogenesis. But my disappointment runs deeper than that. It stems from Meyer’s systematic failure of scholarship. For instance, while I was flattered to find him quote one of my own review papers —although the quote is actually a chimera drawn from two very different parts of my review—he fails to even mention the review’s (and many other papers’) central point: that new genes did not drive the Cambrian explosion. His scholarship, where it matters most, is highly selective.

So, it is clear this is a book based on religion. It sets out to bend facts so that they fit an a priori (that God did it)and it therefore belongs in the Religion section. I wrote the following to Chapters Indigo back in July:

I noticed you have placed Stephen Meyer’s Darwin’s Doubt in your Science section. Also, I received an email book recommendation from Indigo suggesting that Meyer’s Darwin’s Doubt and Dawkin’s The Greatest Show on Earth are “two sides of the same coin”.

 

It is important that you realize that these books are not expressing “two sides of the same coin”. Dawkins’s book elucidates facts about science; Meyer’s book promotes religious Creationism in the form of Intelligent Design (it says so in the sub title on the front cover).

 

Since Intelligent Design is not science (as ruled in the 2005 Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial by U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III when he said that intelligent design is not science and that it “cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents”), this book should not appear in the Science section but should be moved to the religion section.

 

Keeping Meyer’s book in the science section does a disservice to your readers who could be confused by the content.

Chapters Indigo apologized for the mix up and quickly moved the book. I and others checked for a while and it seemed to hold steady in the Religion section. However, as I mentioned above, I found it both in store and online filed in the Science section.

I hate this sort of deception. Someone wanting to know more about Evolution and/or the Cambrian Explosion will be deceived into thinking this is real science because it sits right there next to Jerry Coyne’s book, Why Evolution is True and Richard Dawkins’s book, The Greatest Show on Earth - both excellent and factual books about evolution that everyone should read!

I plan to start emailing Chapters Indigo again. I hope you will too!

Les écoles catholiques sont poison

Christopher Karas a student at École Secondaire Catholique Sainte-Famille in Mississauga knows just how poisonous Catholic Schools can be. According to a Toronto Star article, Christopher Karas, a Grade 12 student at École Secondaire Catholique Sainte-Famille, claims he has been repeatedly belittled by teachers and administration for being gay. Karas’ … Continue reading

“Spaghetti Monster” Poster Offensive to Religion

According to the website Politics.co.uk, a “‘Spaghetti Monster’ poster [was] banned for being offensive to religion.” Secular students at a London university have had a poster featuring a ‘flying spaghetti monster’ banned by union officials, out of fear it would cause offence to religious students. Oh, the poor religious students: … Continue reading

Science and Sensationalism: Fukushima and the Myth of the Giant Squid | MyScienceAcademy

My Science Academy posted a well written article called Science and Sensationalism: Fukushima and the Myth of the Giant Squid today. It debunks some ridiculous internet claims concerning Fukushima, radioactivity and giant squids. These claims wouldn’t become viral sensations if people exercised critical thinking. One of the most important skills you can … Continue reading

Ex-Judge Unconditionally Supports Quebec Charter

An article in L’actualité, by Jocelyne Richer, announces “Ex-Judge Claire L’Heureux-Dubé Unconditionally Supports Charter”: former Supreme Court judge Claire L’Heureux-Dubé expressed unconditional support for the draft charter of secularism of the Marois government. At the same time, she severely criticized the Liberal Party of Philippe Couillard for breaking with its … Continue reading

WordPress theme: Kippis 1.15